![]() ![]() If you’re looking for a quick charge, plugging in a microUSB cable would be way faster. Going from 0% battery to a full charge with your mouse on the PowerPlay would take between 12 and 14 hours, by Logitech’s estimate. That said, as convenient as the PowerPlay is, it isn’t going to get the Logitech G903 fully charged in a jiffy. On a typical day, we use the mouse and specialized charging mat in the office for work and testing, take it out for a few meetings, bring it back home for gaming on our personal rig and come back to the office on the next day to fill the batteries back up with regular usage. In this way, the PowerPlay sets up the perfect way of using a single mouse both at home and on the go. Not only that, the PowerPlay mat comes equipped with a wireless receiver that connects with your mouse, so you won’t need to occupy another USB port for a separate dongle – which you can instead plug into a laptop. With this arrangement, the Logitech G903 can pull a constant current of electricity to both power its operation and recharge its internal batteries. The pad essentially creates an electromagnetic resonance charging field – say that five times fast – that the mouse absorbs through a PowerCore module you can attach to the bottom of the mouse. We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.The Logitech G903’s newest trick is it comes with the ability to wirelessly charge through a specialized mouse pad called the Logitech PowerPlay. The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon. Our testers have started testing this product. For more details, you can see our full changelog here.įixed an error with the number of programmable inputs. This update revamps our Click Latency test and results in changes to test results. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.1. We've updated the text to reflect our new results in various sections, including the Click Latency test box, Usages, Introduction, and other locations where we discuss click latency. We've updated this review to Test Bench 1.1, which revamped our click latency test methodology. For more details, you can see our complete changelog here. This update simplifies our Weight test and expands on our CPI test from Test Bench 1.1, resulting in changes to test results in both sections. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.2. We've added a small disclaimer to the Compatible Software Option section which highlights some of the most commonly reported issues users online have encountered with Logitech's G HUB companion software. For more information, you can check out our full changelog here. This update adds a new Sensor Latency test and makes minor changes to several of our existing tests, resulting in test result changes in several sections. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.3. For more details, you can see our full changelog here. We've moved several minor tests into different test groups, removed the Travel usage, and added a new Raw Performance usage. This update modifies our Hand Size Recommendation test, adding a more granular hand size recommendation chart. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |